Type the missing number in this sequence: 58, _____, 72, 79, 86

Identify Pattern: Identify the pattern in the sequence: 58, _____, 72, 79, 86. We notice that the numbers seem to be increasing. To find the pattern, we need to look at the differences between the numbers.Calculate Differences: Calculate the difference between 72 and 79, and between 79 and 86. 79 - 72 = 7 86 - 79 = 7 The difference between consecutive numbers is 7, which suggests that the sequence increases by 7 each time.Determine Missing Number: Determine the missing number by subtracting 7 from 72. 72 - 7 = 65 The missing number in the sequence should be 65 if the pattern of adding 7 continues.Check Pattern: Check the pattern by adding 7 to 58 to see if we get the missing number. 58 + 7 = 65 The calculation confirms that the missing number is indeed 65.

Resources

Testimonials

Plans

Resources

Testimonials

Plans

AI tutor

Welcome to Bytelearn!

Let’s check out your problem:

Type the missing number in this sequence: $\newline$ $58$ , $\_$ , $72$ , $79$ , $86$

View step-by-step help

Home

Math Problems

Algebra 2

Sequences: mixed review

Full solution

Q. Type the missing number in this sequence:

\newline

58

\_

72

79

86

Identify Pattern: Identify the pattern in the sequence: $58$ , _____, $72$ , $79$ , $86$ . We notice that the numbers seem to be increasing. To find the pattern, we need to look at the differences between the numbers.
Calculate Differences: Calculate the difference between $72$ and $79$ , and between $79$ and $86$ . $\newline$ $79 - 72 = 7$ $\newline$ $86 - 79 = 7$ $\newline$ The difference between consecutive numbers is $7$ , which suggests that the sequence increases by $7$ each time.
Determine Missing Number: Determine the missing number by subtracting $7$ from $72$ . $\newline$ $72 - 7 = 65$ $\newline$ The missing number in the sequence should be $65$ if the pattern of adding $7$ continues.
Check Pattern: Check the pattern by adding $7$ to $58$ to see if we get the missing number. $\newline$ $58 + 7 = 65$ $\newline$ The calculation confirms that the missing number is indeed $65$ .