Let h(x)=x⋅sin(x).Below is Eliza's attempt to write a formal justification for the fact that the equation h(x)=1 has a solution where 0≤x≤2.Is Eliza's justification complete? If not, why?Eliza's justification:h is defined for all real numbers, and polynomial and trigonometric functions are continuous at all points in their domains. Furthermore, h(0)=0 and h(2)≈1.82, so 1 is between h(0) and h(2).So, according to the intermediate value theorem, h(x)=1 must have a solution somewhere between x=0 and x=2.Choose 1 answer:(A) Yes, Eliza's justification is complete.(B) No, Eliza didn't establish that 1 is between h(0) and h(2).(C) No, Eliza didn't establish that h is continuous.
Q. Let h(x)=x⋅sin(x).Below is Eliza's attempt to write a formal justification for the fact that the equation h(x)=1 has a solution where 0≤x≤2.Is Eliza's justification complete? If not, why?Eliza's justification:h is defined for all real numbers, and polynomial and trigonometric functions are continuous at all points in their domains. Furthermore, h(0)=0 and h(2)≈1.82, so 1 is between h(0) and h(2).So, according to the intermediate value theorem, h(x)=1 must have a solution somewhere between x=0 and x=2.Choose 1 answer:(A) Yes, Eliza's justification is complete.(B) No, Eliza didn't establish that 1 is between h(0) and h(2).(C) No, Eliza didn't establish that h is continuous.
Function Definition: Eliza's first claim is that the function h(x)=xsin(x) is defined for all real numbers. This is true because both the polynomial part (x) and the trigonometric part (sin(x)) are defined for all real numbers.
Continuity of Functions: Eliza's second claim is that polynomial and trigonometric functions are continuous at all points in their domains. This is also true; the product of two continuous functions is continuous, so h(x) is continuous everywhere.
Value at x=0: Eliza's third claim is that h(0)=0. This is correct because sin(0)=0, and thus 0×sin(0)=0.
Value at x=2: Eliza's fourth claim is that h(2) is approximately 1.82. To verify this, we need to calculate h(2)=2sin(2). Since sin(2) is not a well-known exact value, we can use a calculator or approximation to find that sin(2) is approximately 0.9093. Therefore, h(2)≈2×0.9093=1.8186, which rounds to approximately 1.82.
Intermediate Value Theorem: Eliza's fifth claim is that since 1 is between h(0) and h(2), the intermediate value theorem guarantees that there is at least one solution to h(x)=1 for some x in the interval [0,2]. This is true because the intermediate value theorem states that if a function is continuous on a closed interval [a,b] and N is any number between f(a) and f(b), then there is at least one number h(0)0 in the interval [a,b] such that h(0)2.
Justification Complete: Eliza's justification seems complete because she has established that h is continuous, h(0)=0, h(2) is approximately 1.82, and 1 is between h(0) and h(2). Therefore, by the intermediate value theorem, there must be a solution to h(x)=1 in the interval [0,2].